What if?

What if all we ever stood for and all we believed in is false? The principals that we were taught? The rules that we grew up with, and those we hold dear? All False?

A sort of computer game that is being played by all…………. but is rigged!

Take a casino for instance….. it needs punters……. it needs gamblers……. but they wont play if they cannot win.

Some do win that spend a sufficient amount of time and that are smart enough. Others win because they cheat……. eventually ending up in a shallow grave in the desert.

The casino wins because at the end of the day when you analyze the punters that come through the door, the ones that win, the ones that lose, and the ones that cheat they have their margin that they know makes sure they cannot lose…. ever! Its rigged!

Every slot machine has to make a payout of its maximum which ensures that others will play even more…… so a jackpot is not a loss…… its a bargain ……

There is only one possible scenario that they can lose …….. and that is when punters stop coming through that door…. so you need to control the winnings enough so that the possibility of winning always attracts the masses

Las Vegas as an example…….. had many millions being spent on a piece of desert….. nothing more….. a piece of wasteland that gave casino principals a new hunting ground that, instead of going to the punter, now made it attractive enough to make the punter come to them.

Absolutely anything you want. If you come to play its there, if you want sex its there, if you want to party its there!

All out of prying eyes…and as we all know….what happens in Vegas…stays in Vegas.

A casino does not care who you are…. they want you to spend your money!

So in all things you can be controlled to your maximum payout….. as long as people come…. When they stop coming …… you very quickly go bust!

Globally it is much the same thing……. People are in control to the extent that you need them to do the work….. you dont care what race they are….the problem is to control them.

The trouble with the system is that people became too nationalistic….. too set in their ways and too hard to change.

In this respect people can compare to their ‘daddies’ day and see where its going….

All men of money…. real money want no more than you to spend your money so they make more…. and… they dont care who or what you are. They earn it with the same characteristic in mind.

Now the two sorts of rich money men….. those like say………. the mafia, who need the common man to make…. so he can come and spend money.

The second rich man thinks that this is small feed to the amount he can take from the small man as part of government…… legally…. like say supporting the military!

In all phases of life are the upper tier, and, the lower tier………. and both have their limits….. both have red lines they will not go beyond and all have future targets of where they want to be.

There are many ways  or many roads that lead to the same destination….. its just a case of which is the easiest.

Say if you have enough money to open a billion dollar car plant…… what difference is it to you whether they open it it Africa, or Denver??? ….. the people are one….. the instability is another….. but as long as they produce the cars at a cheaper cost than what is current, you make more money in real terms than the more expensive car.

What we have seen is that there is no shortage of car plants being created around the world….. India…Pakistan etc…… but do you notice where they do not have plants?…. AFRICA!

In fact such is the confidence in Africa that the money class long abandoned the working man in Africa, simply because they were not dealing with a populace intelligent enough to understand anything that went past a tribe of a sort, that could for a radio be persuaded to change sides.

Africa is an unstable country that cannot be changed…. that being the case means you abandon it till it implodes then come back and pick up the pieces….. Why waste time an effort in the meantime.

In fact if you check out the interest rates paid by any country it is indicative of its stability, and as it gets more civilized it gets more stable.

So its logical to suppose that any guy that is prepared to invest is gonna base that investment on the basis of risk……. which if you have shares in say Venezuela or Angola you may want to hedge your bets.

But like all businesses that are flourishing in money…at times you may want to take a little more risk….as long as the final outcome like being in Las Vegas is that you win!

Here is a video that is kinda long at two hrs is worth watching….. If you have a free mind it may make some sense……. Here

The fact is that there are sections of society that have different priorities……

The ones on the local level of marginal poverty that are being kept afloat by the system…..

Then you have the small entrepreneur that need more time for their business

Thirdly global bankers and their consorts who….. would sell their parents if the price is right.

The ones at the poverty level are the ones chosen to implement the New World Order because they are the most susceptible to the ones that feed them and their families.

The encouragement comes on the back of a system that these men of power had not envisaged……. the internet!

The internet allows us to do our research and reach our own conclusions……

Secondly the ones that have seen…and read about the inevitable that is ahead of us….. The Preppers……. They know upheaval is coming and are taking steps to minimize the damage to themselves……..

The ordinary guy has his family, mortgage, and work to occupy his time…..

Others have much the same….but making vast amounts of money….

I guess each and everyone has his price……

But do your research and be prepared…. because ..inevitably…… the day of reckoning is not too far away!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I am getting old I guess

In the Daily Mail today there is a piece about a ‘poly-amorous’ family that live together Here

Nothing strange about multiple partner arrangements as that has been going on forever in history in one respect or another…… but this one is very different.

These three young people have a different view on who and what they are…………….

Polymorous

The Daily Mail treats it with some seriousness that I fail to understand…………….

One of the people is Nic, then there is Zander and Rachel.

Nic, who was born male and initially lived as a transgender woman, but now identifies as gender neutral and prefers the pronouns ‘they’ and ‘them,’ has always been mainly polyamorous – first dating multiple people during high school.

Then, around a year ago, the TV station worker met delivery driver Rachel, who is a transgender female, through OKCupid, a dating site.

Initially, the pair dated monogamously – or as a ‘closed couple.’ Then Nic met Xander, a transgender male, through work, and the trio now live together and share a king size bed. 

So we have…………………..
Nic —– Born male—– was a transgender woman——-and is now gender neutral
Rachel—- Born male—- and is now a transgender woman.
Xander—- Born female—– who is now a transgender woman.
Transgender people are those who have a gender identity or gender expression that differs from their assigned sex.[1][2][3] Transgender people are sometimes called transsexual if they desire medical assistance to transition from one sex to another. Transgender is also an umbrella term: in addition to including people whose gender identity is the opposite of their assigned sex (trans men and trans women), it may include people who are not exclusively masculine or feminine (people who are genderqueer or non-binary, including bigender, pangender, genderfluid, or agender).[2][4][5] Other definitions of transgender also include people who belong to a third gender, or else conceptualize transgender people as a third gender.[6][7] Infrequently, the term transgender is defined very broadly to include cross-dressers,[8] regardless of their gender identity.
For my own view….. I have none at all on what these people wish to see themselves as….. it is…quite simply none of my business.
But I do have some very serious concerns as to what society forces us to see these people as……… which violates a very simple but exact process…called science!
It is now fact that…………..
The NYCHRL [New York City Human Rights Law] requires employers[, landlords, and all businesses and professionals] to use an [employee’s, tenant’s, customer’s, or client’s] preferred name, pronoun and title (e.g., Ms./Mrs.) regardless of the individual’s sex assigned at birth, anatomy, gender, medical history, appearance, or the sex indicated on the individual’s identification. See here
Even though we have very definitive accepted study that would say that this is simply not true.
From Live-science and The National Library of medicine…. Here

Chromosomes are thread-like molecules that carry hereditary information for everything from height to eye color. They are made of protein and one molecule of DNA, which contains an organism’s genetic instructions, passed down from parents. In humans, animals, and plants, most chromosomes are arranged in pairs within the nucleus of a cell. Humans have 22 of these chromosome pairs, called autosomes.

Humans have an additional pair of sex chromosomes for a total of 46 chromosomes. The sex chromosomes are referred to as X and Y, and their combination determines a person’s sex. Typically, human females have two X chromosomes while males possess an XY pairing. This XY sex-determination system is found in most mammals as well as some reptiles and plants.

There are now more than 200 accepted (by some) as alternative genders including some sub groups of the same gender.

What seems to me as being traditional, scientifically proven, and without doubt……. is now apparently no longer in question…. it is now Law …….

Your gender is no longer what what it is, but what you or the system wants it to be regardless of other individuals feeling or rights which are now dictated to you.

There is enough fact in this particular law to see that if the system disrupts the norm of society we become very easy pawns to be manipulated and accepting of obscure laws no matter how ridiculous and anti everyone………. they may seem.

That said I do not wish to seem old fashioned in these modern days……….. so……. Wiskas (my cat) has decided he is now Boris (my new Great Dane).

This my friends is just a short step away……. destroy the basics of society…….. and our demise is so very easy to arrange……..

Boris….. BORIS…… come here boy………………

 

Marijuana

So much talk about marijuana these days……

So as prescriptions are so easy to actually get you may conclude that around 85% of the American population can legally use Marijuana.

SHORT-TERM EFFECTS see:here

  • Short-term memory problems
  • Severe anxiety, including fear that one is being watched or followed (paranoia)
  • Very strange behavior, seeing, hearing or smelling things that aren’t there, not being able to tell imagination from reality (psychosis)
  • Panic
  • Hallucinations
  • Loss of sense of personal identity
  • Lowered reaction time
  • Increased heart rate (risk of heart attack)
  • Increased risk of stroke
  • Problems with coordination (impairing safe driving or playing sports)
  • Sexual problems (for males)
  • Up to seven times more likely to contract sexually transmitted infections
    than non-users (for females) 22,32 & 33

LONG-TERM EFFECTS

  • Decline in IQ (up to 8 points if prolonged use started in adolescent age)
  • Poor school performance and higher chance of dropping out
  • Impaired thinking and ability to learn and perform complex tasks
  • Lower life satisfaction
  • Addiction (about 9% of adults and 17% of people who started smoking as teens)
  • Potential development of opiate abuse
  • Relationship problems, intimate partner violence
  • Antisocial behavior including stealing money or lying
  • Financial difficulties
  • Increased welfare dependence
  • Greater chances of being unemployed or not getting good jobs.33

Now can you think of a better way of making someone a slave than the use of it?

Or here

Everything you could possibly want in member of society is absent while you have a use of Marijuana…… In fact what you really achieve is dependence on the state….in every way.

Once dependent on the state you are easily pliable to what the state wants.

This is one of probably the most important items that the state is happy to be in control of…….. and assures your vote and compliance. its not by accident…. its by design!

One in every five young adults’ deaths in the US is an opioid overdose, study suggests

Opoid deaths.jpg

So they do what??? They legalize it….. going according to plan? It used to be 1 in 25 deaths……….

Antisocial behavior is another attribute which benefits many sections of government. It allows the police to increase their armament to drastic levels. They can now monitor the cell phones with little or no oversight.Your mail being looked at by the government whenever they chose.

To make an individual anxious perhaps is one of the strongest benefits of the use of Marijuana……. to make them believe there is an enemy within.

What better reason to monitor their rights , introduce more invasive identifications, make more areas off limits to the public….. Its what they want.

With this list of side effects we do not ban it…. we legalize it… which will give more users more dependency on the state.

Now I would ask you again…. What better way to make people slaves to the system than legalizing marijuana……??

Break down society…….. and the res is easy……….Like……….Here

 

Premonition or Mistake?

One of the most remarkable reports on 9/11 came from Jane Stanley, who according to the BBC was in New York at the time of the attacks.

The controversy  with this report is that it came twenty minutes early………………………

The trouble with this report for me personally……. and generally very worrying is that Jane clearly refers to the two towers that have already collapsed…….. and up to this point I could find no news channel that made a reference to Building 7 before its collapse.

Another piece some hours later also adds to the worry of these BBC reports.

BBC's Jane Standley - Audio cuts-out when asked about WTC7

Another ‘mistake’ from the BBC?

The BBC eventually commented on this years later……Did you get that ???? 6 years later!

Part of the conspiracy?

Richard Porter | 17:12 UK time, Tuesday, 27 February 2007

 

The 9/11 conspiracy theories are pretty well known by now. The BBC addressed them earlier this month with a documentary, The Conspiracy Files, shown within the UK.

BBC World logoUntil now, I don’t think we’ve been accused of being part of the conspiracy. But now some websites are using news footage from BBC World on September 11th 2001 to suggest we were actively participating in some sort of attempt to manipulate the audience. As a result, we’re now getting lots of emails asking us to clarify our position. So here goes:

1. We’re not part of a conspiracy. Nobody told us what to say or do on September 11th. We didn’t get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down. We didn’t receive press releases or scripts in advance of events happening.

2. In the chaos and confusion of the day, I’m quite sure we said things which turned out to be untrue or inaccurate – but at the time were based on the best information we had. We did what we always did – sourced our reports, used qualifying words like “apparently” or “it’s reported” or “we’re hearing” and constantly tried to check and double check the information we were receiving.

An image of the website hosting the alleged BBC World footage

3. Our reporter Jane Standley was in New York on the day of the attacks, and like everyone who was there, has the events seared on her mind. I’ve spoken to her today and unsurprisingly, she doesn’t remember minute-by-minute what she said or did – like everybody else that day she was trying to make sense of what she was seeing; what she was being told; and what was being told to her by colleagues in London who were monitoring feeds and wires services.

4. We no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for reasons of cock-up, not conspiracy). So if someone has got a recording of our output, I’d love to get hold of it. We do have the tapes for our sister channel News 24, but they don’t help clear up the issue one way or another.

5. If we reported the building had collapsed before it had done so, it would have been an error – no more than that. As one of the comments on You Tube says today “so the guy in the studio didn’t quite know what was going on? Woah, that totally proves conspiracy… “

****************************

Does it seem logical to you that the great BBC would no longer have tapes of their reports of probably the biggest attack on US soil in history?

Media contact page here

But the more I think about this the more I am resigned to believe she was another reporter that did not do her homework. Why? Because there is no possible useful reason for anyone to bring further people into what must have been a huge plot anyway!

A mistake!

 

The Conspiracy Project

Seldom have I seen a film that has so much logic for truth…….

A film by Neal Fox that has the answers to a heck of a lot of thoughts I have had…… such as why we are going backwards with education…

Are learning more yet understanding less…. why we cant even pick out another country on a map….. and why we are forgetting our history…….

Today we are so corrupted by the media social sites and where to think on your own you are labelled….something which, generally speaking is not nice….

Here is a guy who has put it all into one…and if nothing else take a little time to humor yourself….. and be careful as you do so… you may learn…..