Are we calculating the wrong way?

I saw a rather interesting video on Ted today that looks at similarities of cave signs and paintings global that have some remarkable similarities at a period of 30 or 40 thousand years ago.

The implied premise is that of a language formed by a series of people that had common communication of some sort.

In 1994 Gobeklitepe Temple in Turkey being discovered dating to around 11000 BC….. (This is about 6000 yrs older than Stonehenge in the UK.)….. wheres today’s archeologists stand in awe at our bohemian ancestors that were not very smart. Here

The trouble is here that there is an assumption that the peoples were not far enough advanced to be able to construct in this fashion and at this time…..

The caves they believe left a means of communication …perhaps the first to be read by others……. a sort of a book or newspaper left on the wall.

But whereas these people believe it to be a communication it may well have been an epitaph to disaster in society, where you believe that you are the last ………….forced farther and farther underground for your safety.

I guess you might say the same of the dead sea scrolls except that I believe they were much too important and expensive with years of dedicated works to be just left there.

More likely they were left there for temporary safety and was intended to return for them….. an intent they had robbed of them ………

You can go on with Nazca and paintings of spacemen in a Geolyph.

A geoglyph is a large design or motif (generally longer than 4 metres) produced on the ground and typically formed by clastic rocks or similarly durable elements of the landscape, such as stones, stone fragments, live trees, gravel, or earth.

Carvings of detail that we can only attribute to being one thing.


Think of an alternative to an historical Niel Armstrong if you would. Yep hard isnt it?….. I have spent hours looking at this and cant think of a reasonable alternative…

The bible (no matter which one you read) all tell of flying machines, fire and brimstone, and angels with magical powers that can do spectacular things and can predominantly fly.

Even though we know that a few hundred years back sailing the oceans to wherever we decided to go coupled with colored beads made us seem spectacular, and robbing countries of ideas like gunpowder made us invincible.

A couple of hundred years ago we were looking at ways to get lighter than air machine. So how do you think the Wright Brothers would react to being in a stealth aircraft today?

Perhaps aircraft from a super civilization?

The thing is…… we as humans want attribute these super intelligent people that actually speak or draw as being far ahead of their time, but we don’t ever consider that may be the last surviving remnants of previous civilizations right here on our planet.


Just say for a moment you saw some great catastrophe. We have seen minor ones recently like that of New Orleans. The supposed greatest country in the world took more than three weeks just to get drinking water to these people.

Society collapsed much faster than you we imagined with murders being common place to the extent that even law enforcement officers joined in the melee to survive after giving up on FEMA.

But what if it got worse? pockets of people seeing the gradual death of millions around them…. no electric, phones or or internet would very quickly put us in the dark ages where gangs would roam and be the primary predators.

People who currently rely on the system for their survival like aged, hospitalized and those that need government help would be the first to suffer, but we too would be very close behind them.

In cases of mothers with many children there would be an abrupt end to the only help they have……

But just for one second….one minute…. consider if you were that last one on earth, it is likely you would want to leave our epitaph for others that may follow along behind us…… and that gives all the appearances of a super being when in fact they were our neighbor all along…..

Maybe even trying to tell us where they went wrong to avoid us making the same mistake…. because we has humans actually look out for those that may follow if we are given the chance.

A message in a language long forgotten trying to tell the history of what we have seen before they too become dust in the ground.

And if your not sure that’s what we might do, it may interest you to know…. we have already done it. Who is to say we have done it many times before!

Perhaps they know something we do not?


Not yours to give.

It is well known that money has now become a political tool for the use in politics. The Obama administration increased those getting welfare in the US.

Through the fourth quarter of 2012, there were nearly 110 million Americans receiving some form of government assistance. That’s right around 35% of the total U.S. population

That is a formidable number of votes on your side if the opposition were to threaten to take that away.

In the UK this week they are doing it a slightly different way. With the influx of a lot of immigrants, and the fact that we have people getting health care by taking a holiday in the UK when they get sick (we call it healthcare tourism) The current Prime Minister announces that health care will be increased by 3.8%.

This overshadows the Opposition Party which is at 2% increase.

In both (although different) types of inducements……. they are inducements!…… to every man woman and child that is at or about the poverty line, who will go where they are better off in their pockets.

If you are over 50 you probably know of that frontiersman called Davy Crockett. If your over 60 you probably can sing the words to Davy Crockett.

David “Davy” Crockett was a 19th-century American folk hero, frontiersman, soldier, and politician. He is commonly referred to in popular culture by the epithet “King of the Wild Frontier”

Killed at the battle of Alamo and permanently became known in history as one of the most honest statesmen ever, but probably less known for encounter with a farmer Named Bunce who changed his opinions fundamentally.

This piece although a little long is well worth the read…. and a deep reminder of when some politicians actually had some pride and honesty about them.

David Crockett Portrait


Money with [Congressmen] is nothing but trash when it is to come out of the people. But it is the one great thing for which most of them are striving, and many of them sacrifice honor, integrity, and justice to obtain it.”

Not Yours to Give

Davy Crockett on The Role Of Government
from: The Life of Colonel David Crockett

One day in the House of Representatives, a bill was brought up to appropriate money for the benefit of the widow of a distinguished naval officer. Several beautiful speeches had been made in its support. The Speaker was just about to put the question to a vote when Colonel David Crockett arose:

“Mr. Speaker, I have as much respect for the memory of the deceased, and as much sympathy for the sufferings of the living, as any man in this House. But we must not permit our respect for the dead or our sympathy for a part of the living to lead us into an act of injustice to the balance of the living. I will not go into an argument to prove that Congress has no power to appropriate this money as an act of charity. Every member upon this floor knows it.

“We have the right, as individuals, to give away as much of our own money as we please in charity; but as members of Congress we have no right to so appropriate a dollar of the public money. Some eloquent appeals have been made to us upon the ground that it is a debt due the deceased. Mr. Speaker, the deceased lived long after the close of the war; he was in office to the day of his death, and I have never heard that the government was in arrears to him.

“Every man in this House knows it is not a debt. We cannot, without the grossest corruption, appropriate this money as the payment of a debt. We have not the semblance of authority to appropriate it as a charity. Mr. Speaker, I have said we have the right to give as much money of our own as we please. I am the poorest man on this floor. I cannot vote for this bill, but I will give one week’s pay to the object, and if every member of Congress will do the same, it will amount to more than the bills asks.”

He took his seat. Nobody replied. The bill was put upon its passage and, instead of passing unanimously, as was generally supposed and as, no doubt, it would but for that speech, it received but few votes and was lost.

Later, when asked by a friend why he had opposed the appropriation, Crockett gave this explanation:

“Several years ago I was one evening standing on the steps of the Capitol with some other members of Congress, when our attention was attracted by a great light over in Georgetown. It was evidently a large fire. We jumped into a hack and drove over as fast as we could. In spite of all that could be done, many houses were burned and many families made homeless and, besides, some of them had lost all but the clothes they had on.

“The weather was very cold and, when I saw so many women and children suffering, I felt that something ought to be done for them. The next morning a bill was introduced, appropriating $20,000 for their relief. We put aside all other business and rushed it through as soon as it could be done.

“The next summer, when it began to be time to think about the election, I concluded I would take a scout around among the boys of my district. I had no opposition there but, as the election was some time off, I did not know what might turn up. When riding one day in a part of my district in which I was more of a stranger than in any other, I saw a man in a field plowing and coming toward the road.

“I gauged my gait so that we should meet as he came to the fence. As he came up, I spoke to the man. He replied politely, but, as I thought, rather coldly.

“I began: ‘Well, friend, I am one of those unfortunate beings called candidates, and – ‘

“‘Yes, I know you; you are Colonel Crockett. I have seen you once before, and voted for you the last time you were elected. I suppose you are out electioneering now, but you had better not waste your time or mine. I shall not vote for you again.’

“This was a sockdolager… I begged him to tell me what was the matter.

“‘Well, Colonel, it is hardly worthwhile to waste time or words upon it. I do not see how it can be mended, but you gave a vote last winter which shows that either you have not the capacity to understand the Constitution, or that you are wanting in the honesty and firmness to be guided by it. In either case, you are not the man to represent me. But I beg your pardon for expressing it in that way. I did not intend to avail myself of the privilege of the constituent to speak plainly to a candidate for the purpose of insulting or wounding you. I intend by it only to say that your understanding of the Constitution is very different from mine.

“‘I will say to you what, but for my rudeness I should not have said, that I believe you to be honest. But an understanding of the Constitution different from mine I cannot overlook, because the Constitution, to be worth anything, must be held sacred, and rigidly observed in all its provisions. The man who wields power and misinterprets it is the more dangerous the more honest he is.’

“I said, ‘I admit the truth of all you say, but there must be some mistake about it, for I do not remember that I gave any vote last winter upon any Constitutional question.’

“‘No, Colonel, there’s no mistake. Though I live here in the backwoods and seldom go from home, I take the papers from Washington and read very carefully all proceedings of Congress. My papers say that last winter you voted for a bill to appropriate $20,000 to some sufferers by a fire in Georgetown. Is that true?”

“‘Well, my friend, I may as well own up. You have got me there. But certainly nobody will complain that a great and rich country like ours should give the insignificant sum of $20,000 to relieve its suffering women and children, particularly with a full and overflowing treasury, and I am sure, if you had been there, you would have done just as I did.’

“‘It is not the amount, Colonel, that I complain of; it is the principle. In the first place, the government ought to have in the treasury no more money than enough for its legitimate purposes. But that has nothing to do with the question. The power of collecting and disbursing money at pleasure is the most dangerous power that can be entrusted to man, particularly under our system of collecting revenue by a tariff, which reaches every man in the country, no matter how poor he may be, and the poorer he is the more he pays in proportion to his means.

“‘What is worse, it presses upon him without his knowledge where the weight centers, for there is not a man in the United States who can ever guess how many thousands are worse off than he. If you had the right to give anything, the amount was simply a matter of discretion with you, and you had as much right to give $20,000,000 as $20,000.

“‘If you have the right to give to one, you have the right to give to all; and, as the Constitution neither defines charity nor stipulates the amount, you are at liberty to give to any and everything which you may believe, or profess to believe, is a charity, and to any amount you may think proper. You will very easily perceive what a wide door this would open for fraud and corruption and favoritism, on the one hand, and for robbing the people on the other.

“‘No, Colonel, Congress has no right to give charity. Individual members may give as much of their own money as they please, but they have no right to touch a dollar of the public money for that purpose. If twice as many houses had been burned in this county as in Georgetown, neither you nor any other member of Congress would have thought of appropriating a dollar for our relief. There are about two hundred and forty members of Congress. If they had shown their sympathy for the sufferers by contributing each one week’s pay, it would have made over $13,000. There are plenty of wealthy men in and around Washington who could have given $20,000 without depriving themselves of even a luxury of life.

“‘The Congressmen chose to keep their own money which, if reports be true, some of them spend not very creditably; and the people of Washington, no doubt, applauded you for relieving them from the necessity of giving by giving what was not yours to give. The people have delegated to Congress, by the Constitution, the power to do certain things. To do these, it is authorized to collect and pay moneys, and for nothing else. Everything beyond this is stipulation, and a violation of the Constitution.

“‘So you see, Colonel, you have violated the Constitution in what I consider a vital point. It is a precedent fraught with danger to the country, for when Congress once begins to stretch its power beyond the limits of the Constitution, there is no limit to it, and no security for the people. I have no doubt you acted honestly, but that does not make it any better, except as far as you are personally concerned, and you see that I cannot vote for you.’


“I tell you, I felt streaked. I saw if I should have opposition, and this man should go to talking, he would set others to talking, and in that district I was a gone fawn-skin. I could not answer him, and the fact is, I was so fully convinced that he was right, I did not want to. But I must satisfy him, and I said to him:

“‘Well, my friend, you hit the nail upon the head when you said I had not sense enough to understand the Constitution. I intended to be guided by it, and thought I had studied it fully. I have heard many speeches in Congress about the powers of Congress, but what you have said here at your plow has got more hard, sound sense in it than all the fine speeches I ever heard.

“‘If I had ever taken the view of it that you have, I would have put my head into the fire before I would have given that vote; and if you will forgive me and vote for me again, if I ever vote for another unconstitutional law I wish I may be shot.’

“He laughingly replied: ‘Yes, Colonel, you have sworn to that once before, but I will trust you again on one condition. You say that you are convinced that your vote was wrong. Your acknowledgment of it will do more good than beating you for it. If, as you go around the district, you will tell people about this vote, and that you are satisfied it was wrong, I will not only vote for you, but will do what I can to keep down opposition, and, perhaps, I may exert some little influence in that way.’

“‘If I don’t,’ said I, ‘I wish I may be shot; and, to convince you that I am in earnest in what I say, I will come back this way in a week or ten days, and if you will get up a gathering of the people, I will make a speech to them. Get up a barbecue, and I will pay for it.’

“‘No, Colonel, we are not rich people in this section, but we have plenty of provisions to contribute for a barbecue, and some to spare for those who have none. The push of crops will be over in a few days, and we can then afford a day for a barbecue. This is Thursday; I will see to getting it up on Saturday week. Come to my house on Friday, and we will go together, and I promise you a very respectable crowd to see and hear you.’

“‘Well, I will be here. But, one thing more before I say goodbye. I must know your name.’

“‘My name is Bunce.’

“‘Well, Mr. Bunce, I never saw you before, though you say you have seen me, but I know you very well. I am glad I have met you, and very proud that I may hope to have you for my friend.

“It was one of the luckiest hits of my life that I met him. He mingled but little with the public, but was widely known for his remarkable intelligence and incorruptible integrity, and for a heart brimful and running over with kindness and benevolence, which showed themselves not only in words, but in act. He was the oracle of the whole country around him, and his fame had extended far beyond the circle of his immediate acquaintances.

“Though I had never met him before, I had heard of him, and but for this meeting it is very likely I should have had opposition and been beaten. One thing is certain, no man could now stand up in that district under such a vote.

“At the appointed time I was at his house, having told our conversation to every crowd I had met, and to every man I stayed all night with, and I found that it gave the people an interest and a confidence in me stronger than I had ever seen manifested before.

“Though I was considerably fatigued when I reached his house, and under ordinary circumstances, should have gone early to bed, I kept him up until midnight, talking about the principles and affairs of government, and got more true knowledge of them than I had got all my life before.

“I have known and seen much of him since, for I respect him – no, that is not the word – I reverence and love him more than any living man. I got to see him two or three times every year; and I will tell you, sir, if everyone who professes to be a Christian lived and acted and enjoyed it as he does, the religion of Christ would take the world by storm.

“But to return to my story. The next morning we went to the barbecue and, to my surprise, found about a thousand men there. I met a good many whom I have not known before, and they and my friend introduced me around until I had got pretty well acquainted-at least, they all knew me.

“In due time notice was given that I would speak to them. They gathered up around a stand that had been erected. I opened my speech by saying:

“‘Fellow citizens, I present myself before you today feeling like a new man. My eyes have lately been opened to truths which ignorance or prejudice, or both, had heretofore hidden from my view. I feel that I can today offer you the ability to render you more valuable service than I have ever been able to render before. I am here today more for the purpose of acknowledging my error than to seek your votes. That I should make this acknowledgment is due to my self as well as to you. Whether you will vote for me is a matter for your consideration.’

“I went on to tell them about the fire and my vote for the appropriation and then told them that I was satisfied it was wrong. I closed by saying:

“‘And now, it remains for me to tell you that the most of the speech you have listened to with so much interest was simply a repetition of the arguments which your neighbor, Mr. Bunce, convinced me of my error.

“‘It is the best speech I ever made in my life, but he is entitled to credit for it. And now I hope he is satisfied with this convert and that he will get up here and tell you so.’

“He came up on the stand and said:

“‘Fellow citizens, it affords me great pleasure to comply with the request of Colonel Crockett. I have always considered him a thoroughly honest man, and I am satisfied that he will faithfully perform all that he has promised you today.’

“He went down, and there went up from the crowd such a shout for Davy Crockett as his name never called forth before.

“I am not much given to tears, but I was taken with a choking then and felt some drops rolling down my cheeks. I tell you, the remembrance of those few words spoken by such a man, and the honest, hearty shout they produced, is worth more to me than all the honors I have received and all the reputation I have made as a member of Congress.

“Now, sir,” concluded Crockett, “you know why I made that speech yesterday.

“There is one thing to which I will call your attention. You remember that I proposed to give a week’s pay. There are in that House many very wealthy men – men who think nothing of spending a week’s pay for a dinner or a wine party when they have something to accomplish by it. Some of those same men made beautiful speeches upon the great debt of gratitude owed the deceased – a debt which could not be paid by money – and the insignificance and worthlessness of money, particularly so insignificant a sum as $10,000, when weighted against the honor of the nation. Yet not one of them responded to my proposition. Money with them is nothing but trash when it is to come out of the people. But is the one great thing for which most of them are striving, and many of them sacrifice honor, integrity, and justice to obtain it.”

This is as true today as it was then……………………………Almost 200yrs ago



Men of God eh?

28 UN General Assembly condemns only Israel on Gaza, cancel American amendment to condemn Hamas as well

The United Nations General Assembly on Wednesday passed a resolution condemning Israel for using excessive, disproportionate and indiscriminate force during the recent clashes at the Gaza border and calling for an international protection mechanism for the Palestinians.

The resolution, proposed by Algeria and Turkey, passed with 120 “yes” votes, 8 “no” votes and 45 abstentions. The countries that voted against the resolution were the US, Israel, Australia, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Nauru, Togo and the Solomon Islands.

The dramatic session saw the United States attempt to add a paragraph condemning Hamas as well, which was ultimately rejected on procedural grounds though it had a majority of votes.

US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley, arguing that the draft was biased against Israel, proposed an amendment that would have added an explicit condemnation of the Hamas Islamic organization and its firing of rockets, promotion of violence at the Gaza border, and digging of tunnels to infiltrate into Israel.

But Algeria called for a “no-action motion,” which would have prevented a vote on the amendment. According to General Assembly rules, the motion was put to a vote of all member states. Surprisingly, 78 countries opposed Algeria’s move while only 59 supported it.

Haley’s amendment cleared with a small majority, 62 to 58, with 42 abstentions.

However, General Assembly President Miroslav Lajčák, of Slovakia, ruled that a 2/3 majority was needed for an amendment to be added to a draft resolution.

Haley appealed his decision, which led the session to be adjourned for several minutes.

When the session reconvened, Lajčák put Haley’s appeal to a vote. 66 countries voted in favor, 72 opposed and 26 countries abstained, which meant that the original draft was put to a vote without the US amendment.

Haley condemned the final vote as a morally bankrupt judgement, but she also argued that the common practice of turning a blind eye to the UN’s anti-Israel bias is changing.


Penka the Pregnant Cow

Me??? well normally I don’t really have too much to do with pregnant cows, and to be honest have little time for them.

The last year or so I have been off red meat completely so they interest me even less, but Penka is a different story.

Penka is an EU born cow that broke free one night when wolves chased her and ended up in Serbia…. Just a few miles away.  I know…. you would expect a cow that wears a tag around its neck that says Bulgaria to know that she is violating EU rules.

So off goes the farmer to pick up his cow and on his return the border guards say that his wandering cow does not have the correct paperwork……. read more here

The idea that even that we have been given horse meat passed off as beef controls are in place to stop any animal diseases being brought into the EU.

For those of us that lived through the seventies and can remember Foot and Mouth which resulted in whole herds getting destroyed it rings a bell.

But this particular cow was gone a couple of days before being located…… so…. as the border guards said…….‘It is not for us to decide — we are only implementing rules that come from Brussels.’

And that is the point of my writing……. not the cow….. the rules!!
Ever noticed the best way for any employee to legitimize just about anything….?
“We are only implementing rules”
You might have heard it in many different ways such “Its company policy” or “We are not authorized to do that!”
Some years ago (well about 30yrs ago) I lived in a rural area…… I had an argument with my wife and resorted to removing myself from the problem so as to minimize impact.
I went for a drive got a six pack and went to a lovely spot overlooking the sea…. a couple of miles away that was really very pretty.
I did not even see the police car when it pulled up behind me…. and I was on my third beer!
Too late to try hiding the cans…. he was already on his way to my open window.
Do you have a problem? he asked while scanning the passenger seat with not only the full cans but the empty ones too.
Nope I said….. just the wife giving me some jip so I got away for a while!
Where do you live?
I told him where it was …. almost two miles away.
He got closer and made small talk …. all the while I could feel the analysis on whether I was impaired to drive……. Not legally impaired you understand…… that was obvious with the traitorous cans by my side…..but physically impaired!
He said …….Are you going straight home from here? in a very gentle tone…….. Yes I said!
He said you Are going straight home now? Directly home?
It was not a question really it was a command!
It was early days of the breathalyzer and the penalties were very harsh…. and to lose your license in the countryside would have been terrible……… and strictly speaking I had just lost mine for 18 months!
I am going right now……..
Off he went…. off I went having no idea if he was making a check on me……..
Today it would be…………… explain it to the judge…. after a night in the cells………
I think the officer did the right thing…. establishing the circumstance first, and using his discretion…. something impossible to do today.
Although discretion can also be a very bad thing, it sometimes can be a godsend, well certainly in my case.
The flip side however is that if you do not have discretion …the control… and have to refer higher…… agendas can be promoted, and central control of people is inevitable.
Ever notice that you get a once in a lifetime event…. with a very small percentage of the population……… soon after another control law is introduced that just fuel the Big Brother aspect?
Take 9/11 for instance. The US public surrendered all rights all control to their lives the day after.
All phone records were legally searchable on the say so of practically any government agency.
Airport security has gone to silly levels where a baby is taken out of its mothers arms to be searched…… or as this week a 102 yr old woman in a wheelchair had a pat down that took ten minutes, and did not stop till all her dignity had long since departed…. 102 yrs old!
You are now legally a terrorist…. unless you can prove otherwise, and not one single thing that has been put into force today could have changed the outcome on 9/11.
There are things that could however…. such as strengthening cabin doors to stop intrusion…. perhaps gas that could be administered by the pilot to sedate all passengers.
Even the FBI actually taking notice of warnings from other countries, and implementing their own rules for prevention of terrorism…….
In the first it promotes finance for security and keeps the public in perpetual panic of terrorists coming out of the walls, creating fear so that you need your protection……. Big Brother is saving us!
Correcting their own house first as in the second by taking steps that cost money and are more effective does not achieve the agenda because it would actually be more cost effective and would make the chance of another hijack almost impossible. But would cost big companies only!
Discretion is the higher form of valor, and, for Penka the Cow, could have been applied by the border guard……… If only Big Brother would allow him to….. but instead it has been turned into an international incident!

What if?

What if all we ever stood for and all we believed in is false? The principals that we were taught? The rules that we grew up with, and those we hold dear? All False?

A sort of computer game that is being played by all…………. but is rigged!

Take a casino for instance….. it needs punters……. it needs gamblers……. but they wont play if they cannot win.

Some do win that spend a sufficient amount of time and that are smart enough. Others win because they cheat……. eventually ending up in a shallow grave in the desert.

The casino wins because at the end of the day when you analyze the punters that come through the door, the ones that win, the ones that lose, and the ones that cheat they have their margin that they know makes sure they cannot lose…. ever! Its rigged!

Every slot machine has to make a payout of its maximum which ensures that others will play even more…… so a jackpot is not a loss…… its a bargain ……

There is only one possible scenario that they can lose …….. and that is when punters stop coming through that door…. so you need to control the winnings enough so that the possibility of winning always attracts the masses

Las Vegas as an example…….. had many millions being spent on a piece of desert….. nothing more….. a piece of wasteland that gave casino principals a new hunting ground that, instead of going to the punter, now made it attractive enough to make the punter come to them.

Absolutely anything you want. If you come to play its there, if you want sex its there, if you want to party its there!

All out of prying eyes…and as we all know….what happens in Vegas…stays in Vegas.

A casino does not care who you are…. they want you to spend your money!

So in all things you can be controlled to your maximum payout….. as long as people come…. When they stop coming …… you very quickly go bust!

Globally it is much the same thing……. People are in control to the extent that you need them to do the work….. you dont care what race they are….the problem is to control them.

The trouble with the system is that people became too nationalistic….. too set in their ways and too hard to change.

In this respect people can compare to their ‘daddies’ day and see where its going….

All men of money…. real money want no more than you to spend your money so they make more…. and… they dont care who or what you are. They earn it with the same characteristic in mind.

Now the two sorts of rich money men….. those like say………. the mafia, who need the common man to make…. so he can come and spend money.

The second rich man thinks that this is small feed to the amount he can take from the small man as part of government…… legally…. like say supporting the military!

In all phases of life are the upper tier, and, the lower tier………. and both have their limits….. both have red lines they will not go beyond and all have future targets of where they want to be.

There are many ways  or many roads that lead to the same destination….. its just a case of which is the easiest.

Say if you have enough money to open a billion dollar car plant…… what difference is it to you whether they open it it Africa, or Denver??? ….. the people are one….. the instability is another….. but as long as they produce the cars at a cheaper cost than what is current, you make more money in real terms than the more expensive car.

What we have seen is that there is no shortage of car plants being created around the world….. India…Pakistan etc…… but do you notice where they do not have plants?…. AFRICA!

In fact such is the confidence in Africa that the money class long abandoned the working man in Africa, simply because they were not dealing with a populace intelligent enough to understand anything that went past a tribe of a sort, that could for a radio be persuaded to change sides.

Africa is an unstable country that cannot be changed…. that being the case means you abandon it till it implodes then come back and pick up the pieces….. Why waste time an effort in the meantime.

In fact if you check out the interest rates paid by any country it is indicative of its stability, and as it gets more civilized it gets more stable.

So its logical to suppose that any guy that is prepared to invest is gonna base that investment on the basis of risk……. which if you have shares in say Venezuela or Angola you may want to hedge your bets.

But like all businesses that are flourishing in money…at times you may want to take a little more risk….as long as the final outcome like being in Las Vegas is that you win!

Here is a video that is kinda long at two hrs is worth watching….. If you have a free mind it may make some sense……. Here

The fact is that there are sections of society that have different priorities……

The ones on the local level of marginal poverty that are being kept afloat by the system…..

Then you have the small entrepreneur that need more time for their business

Thirdly global bankers and their consorts who….. would sell their parents if the price is right.

The ones at the poverty level are the ones chosen to implement the New World Order because they are the most susceptible to the ones that feed them and their families.

The encouragement comes on the back of a system that these men of power had not envisaged……. the internet!

The internet allows us to do our research and reach our own conclusions……

Secondly the ones that have seen…and read about the inevitable that is ahead of us….. The Preppers……. They know upheaval is coming and are taking steps to minimize the damage to themselves……..

The ordinary guy has his family, mortgage, and work to occupy his time…..

Others have much the same….but making vast amounts of money….

I guess each and everyone has his price……

But do your research and be prepared…. because ..inevitably…… the day of reckoning is not too far away!

























































I read an article on Al Jazeera about the supposedly systematic persecution of Muslims in the USA…..

The fundamentals of the video are that an anti Muslim groups in the USA are targeting Muslims unfairly. Much of the video is based on what those who are protesting, and those who fund them are focusing on.

The Muslim Brotherhood it is claimed is a group who’s name crops up most often which they say is unjust……. as it is a misnomer and does not apply to them.

Keith Ellison is a figure that crops up often in the video…. who is now in the senate and has very high aspirations even that the Democratic party resoundingly voted against.

Louis Farrakhan

Louis Farrakhan Sr. (born Louis Eugene Walcott; May 11, 1933), formerly known as Louis X, is an American religious leader, black nationalist, activist, and social commentator. He is the leader of the religious group Nation of Islam (NOI) and served as the minister of major mosques in Boston and Harlem, and was appointed by longtime NOI leader Elijah Muhammad as the National Representative of the Nation of Islam.

Read more here

In his early years he had been connected to many illegal issues, and even being accused of being involved in the murder of Malcolm X.

The video emphasizes the groups which anonymously donate to the promotion of anti Muslim groups in the USA.

These fundamentally being Jewish groups that do not wish to publicize their support.

The implication in the video seems to be that Muslims are being unfairly targeted either by those that have little information, those that want to spread hate, or those that do not have tolerance to other religions.

Tarred with the same Brush?

One of the main arguments from the Muslims seem to be to try and distance themselves from other Militant groups that the West associates with general Islamic practices.

And from those so called Islamophobic’s who say that if you allow a particular religion to get hold and into politics than its a short step to a sharia system.

So we have on both sides benefactors that want one side or the other to prevail.

The likes of Keith Ellison or Louis Farrakhan cannot be relied upon.

So what do we actually see?

In the USA…. which is a country born on religion looks at what is happening not only on their doorstep, but in other countries that seem to indicate that Muslims are being given a benefit that Christians do not normally have advantage of.

For instance in the UK a Sharia court takes priority before local court. The crime of bigamy apparently does not apply to them, or that of ‘common law wives’

Here is a very interesting insight to Sharia courts

The recent case of Tommy Robinson, who has just been sentenced to 13 months in prison for this:

Tommy has been very prevalent in drawing attention to Pedophile gangs.

This sentence is for contempt of court for an earlier similar offense where he was bound to keep the piece for three years two years ago.

Part of the problem seems to stem from the fact that if any they (The Defendants) thought under age girl was older and she was willing…… many get found not guilty regardless of British law. ( A white British cannot use this as defense )

Another problem is that Allah Akbar or God is Great is a universal chant among Muslims.


This guy was chanting this when he cut off the head of Lee Rigby in London (of all places)

Today he wants to apologize to the parents of Rigby…. Read More Here

A further problem for Americans is what seems to be activity against the Christian faith in other quarters, such as bakers that do not wish to bake cakes for Gays.

The Gresham bakers who made national headlines after refusing to bake a cake for a same-sex wedding have closed shop, for the business. Read More Here

So it would seem on multiple fronts that Christians are being victimized…. to them at least!

An interesting short account from the French President of all people….. Read More Here

Then there is the Koran which is universal to all Muslim teachings, yet the American Muslim laments that its the interpretation of the reader that defines the rules.

Well these rules seem definitive no matter how you would wish to define them….

Death by.....jpg

In contrast to Christian teachings of forgiveness as a principal action, and never death.

We do however have this:…….


This is not to say that western Muslims practice such things, but if they stick absolutely to the Koran…. they would be…..and that is what people of other faiths see and some times by example.

Perhaps the Christians have a right to be fearful of a faith that if become the majority have sworn to eradicate all others?



MH 370 Disappearance.

Its been called the greatest mystery of all time. A modern up to date and very reliable aircraft just disappears………

Simply vanishing from the face of the earth, and the absolute most up to date and reliable undersea scanning equipment cannot find it….. even after years……

Firstly ….nothing on this planet just disappears…… Any criminal that commits a crime…always ….. and I mean without exception…..leaves a trail.

What we aim to do is find where the answers may lie, discounting of course Aliens, The Bermuda triangle….. or a wormhole to another dimension. Because the author believes the culprit much closer to home.

What happened on March 8th 2014?

Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 (MH370/MAS370)[a] was a scheduled international passenger flight operated by Malaysia Airlines that disappeared on 8 March 2014 while flying from Kuala Lumpur International Airport, Malaysia, to its destination, Beijing Capital International Airport in China. The crew of the Boeing 777-200ER aircraft last made contact with air traffic control around 38 minutes after takeoff when the flight was over the South China Sea. It was lost from ATC radar screens minutes later, but was tracked by military radar for another hour, deviating westwards from its planned flight path, crossing the Malay Peninsula and Andaman Sea, where it vanished 200 nautical miles (370 km) northwest of Penang Island in northwestern Malaysia. With all 227 passengers and 12 crew on board presumed dead, the disappearance of Flight 370 was the deadliest incident involving a Boeing 777 and the deadliest incident in Malaysia Airlines’ history, until it was surpassed in both regards by Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 four months later. The combined loss led to significant financial problems for Malaysia Airlines, which was renationalised by the Malaysian government.

Read More Here

This is the actual flight that most seem to agree on……


The Sherlock Holmes principle?……….. ‘Once you have discounted the impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.’

So if we are to play detectives we need to examine all possible possibilities…………..

  • Aircraft crashed
  • The aircraft is hidden

The aircraft cannot be found….. so it can only be these reasons.

So if these are the only possible reasons and assume that it must be one of these we next need to explore why.

  • Aircraft malfunctioned
  • Someone other than pilots took control
  • Pilot (s) committed suicide

Assuming there are no further possibilities we next to find a reason for taking an airliner.

  • Vengeance
  • Gain

At 18.22 UTC the aircraft was last recorded as being anywhere at all so let that be our starting point…… How far could it have got?


So what is definitive is that on 46000lbs of fuel it has to be inside this circle! and in addition it either crashed or its hidden.


What is absolute is that if it crashed there must be wreckage! In a run out of fuel environment there would be little or no control to this modern fly by wire aircraft.

If it was ditched in the sea it is extremely unlikely that it could have stayed in one piece (but possible).

Both of these items are contradicted by the fact that the aircraft was deliberately flown off course (by someone). When in fact these could be accomplished no matter which direction it flew. The clue may be the VERY specific turns the aircraft appears to have made.


If the aircraft was indeed hidden there has to be a reason……..

Why was the Jindalee Operational Radar Network not able to pick it up. It covers the whole of the presumed area.

Read more Here

So we now go to the second stage of:-

Aircraft malfunctioned

There are points that would indicate that this is just not a reasonable conclusion…. other than some steep dives and steep recoveries (possibly fight for controls) all other actions show an aircraft being controlled……

Very specific turns, transponder being switched off, and pings being returned for several hours after take off from engines.

Someone other than pilots took control

The aircraft is a Boeing 777 200ER by all accounts a very safe aircraft. It does not switch off its transponder and take another course to which the captain has programmed in.

The continuing mystery concerning the whereabouts of the missing Malaysian Airlines Flight 370 has triggered intense conversations in certain circles about whether the Boeing aircraft could have been taken over from the ground. The Boeing 777 is a “fly-by-wire” aircraft, which means that all of the aeronautical functions of the plane are controlled through digital electronics, rather than hydraulic controls.

Read More Here

The passengers are pretty well OK except a query is against 4 scientists

Of the 227 passengers, 152 were Chinese citizens, including a group of 19 artists with six family members and four staff returning from a calligraphy exhibition of their work in Kuala Lumpur; 38 passengers were Malaysian. The remaining passengers were from 13 different countries.[28][36] Twenty passengers—12 of whom were from Malaysia and eight from China—were employees of Freescale Semiconductor.[37][38]

There is nothing about the passengers that give cause for concern other than two were traveling on forged passports.

The authorities discounted them being an issue very early on…. which has always puzzled me.

The main possible conspirators has to be two men traveling on forged passports that the Malaysian Government forged pictures of.

They spent the Night with a friend they just happened to find and their tickets were bought by a Mr Ali???????

Someone has to be nuts!!!!! Read more Here

Can you think of a reason that the government would forge your picture on a missing flight?

Suspect #1 Pilots

Suspect #2

Secondly the two guys that were traveling on forged passports……………….


Discounted by all concerned very early on………………especially INTERPOL!

The headline in The Guardian read:

Iranians travelling on flight MH370 on forged passports ‘not linked to terror’

Read More Here

This bothered me because when you have lost an aircraft with no trace…… and after a couple of years you cannot establish anything of the aircraft……. Then some power that be says its not worth investigating? EVERY avenue is worth investigation!

A very important part that many of the public are not aware of is that although the two very grainy pictures above are purported to be these guys……. are they?

Try another couple of pics of them that were the official pictures given to the public.

Doctored 1Doctored 2

Now what do you see?… Look closely…. closer?

The lower portion of both pictures are from the same photograph….. they have been doctored by an official for someone or something.

And the whole thing was brushed aside.

Read More Here.

Can YOU think of any reason at all when an aircraft is lost with so many lives that someone would FAKE a photograph?

Not convinced???? These doctored photographs are actually the same as the ones at the top…. the very same photograph…..

Yet our famed police INTERPOL says they are not an issue because they were not linked to terror……..

Well me??? I am not too bright……. and I have a couple of questions……..

  1. How does anyone know these are the two guys that were on that plane? If all we have is a forged passport picture (by those in authority) to go on?
  2. Who forged these pictures?
  3. Who authorized forging those pictures?
  4. Why did they forge those pictures?

Because I cannot think of a single acceptable excuse.

Suspect #3

The four Chinese guys that worked for Freescale Semiconductor…….. (so did another 16 more that were on this flight)……. but this particular four were virtually millionaires and would have been a week after this flight.

Freescale Semiconductor is owned by The Rothchilds…. and these particular four guys were to have a patent registered when they returned from China… the following week.

That patent was for a cloaking device that could have rendered planes and vehicles invisible. A military device!

Read more here or Here or Here

They were on 20% shares each…… with these four dying before the patent was registered…. means the sole survivor is actually the patent owner. Rothchild!

Suspect #4

It would seem to me that these guys would also have been carrying a lot of information of this device, and in the hands of another country would prove very useful to their armies.

For such a thing to happen you would undoubtedly need the co-operation of many existing players in this event plus a couple more (such as Interpol) to cement the proceedings.

Can you think of a country that would have no qualms about downing an airliner killing hundreds of people to get it?

The official reason for the photo ‘error’ is that the two pictures were inadvertently copied in error on the photo copier…….?

I can find no way to put these pictures in a photo copier to get that same result without cutting the top off one of them.

“It is confirmed now that they are not Asian-looking men,” Malaysia’s civil aviation chief, Azharuddin Abdul Rahman, told a press conference Monday evening in Kuala Lumpur.

When reporters asked for a description, Mr. Azharuddin referred to Mario Balotelli, an Italian soccer star whose birth parents are from Ghana.

He wouldn’t elaborate. “I don’t want to dwell about it but they are not Asian-looking.”

Read More Here


My question is WHY?????????

In the space of two days no one can give you any idea what happened to an aircraft…….. but both INTERPOL and The Malaysian Government can categorically say that two guys that were traveling on forged passports had nothing to do with its loss…….. and they “Dont want to dwell about it”

I smell a rat… a very big and dirty one!!!!!!!

Pilot (s) committed suicide

This I find an interesting scenario……… even though an illogical one.

Both pilots by all accounts were exemplary flying officers…… played by the book throughout their flying career and made no mistakes.

Read More Here

Think in your mind the most prominent plane incident you can ever remember????

How about 9/11…….. The most memorable

If you were a pilot committing suicide just how could you top it?? As some have said the pilot may have just wanted this to be an unsolved sort of enigma?

I think if he were inclined to commit suicide and immortality for some gruesome reason I would say that he would leave no doubt….. otherwise his name goes into obscurity.

His being immortalized was right on his doorstep and about five minutes from where he took off……….


Flying your plane into these towers would be a very quick death and you would be in history one way or another….for ever!


Not yet decided


This is the only absolute I can find with all these queries……………

On this aircraft there was 2.4 tons of Cargo that no one wants to talk about……. Think why wont Malaysian Airways tell us what this extra cargo that was not on the manifest was?

Read More Here

How about the deaths of two ex US Navy seals…. who I would imagine are quite difficult to kill? Just 15 days before the disappearance of MH370 but after delivering its cargo.

“What’s the chance of two ex-Navy SEALs turning up dead in the same room?’ Family and friends demand U.S. investigation into mystery ‘hookers and heroin’ deaths on ship made famous by Captain Philips”

But an excuse that has not really been challenged……. and has been forgotten.


On the basis that no entity has actually given us any idea formally of what they believe happened to MH 370 (other than possible scenarios) I will offer up a possibility that is more than guesswork..

Working on the basis that to every crime (and it is a crime) there has to be a motive…… In history even the most sadistic, the most prolific and the most hideous that we have managed to secure has had a motive.

With the passengers that have been firmly identified I see no possible motive.

With the pilots I see a possible motive but so very unlikely.

With the aircraft that appeared to be doing exactly what it was asked I do not see its error, other than others controlled it to its final resting place. It did not malfunction.

The Sherlock Holmes principle?……….. ‘Once you have discounted the impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.’

I think the answer lies in two possible connected events.

Event 1

That the two navy seals delivered the cargo to the aircraft and somehow, by design or accident saw what that cargo was…….

If the cargo was some sort of cloaking machine , it does not matter…. it could have been gold….. either way if they saw it they had to die.

Just in case they put two and two together with the eventual disappearance of MH370 in the future.

Event 2

I think that the two Iranians were not whom they seem and have been introduced for convenient answers….. this shows in the childlike forged pictures.

I think both of these were pilots, working for another entity and the plane was flown along country air demarcation lines….. in a zig zag effect….. one country then the next.

Air traffic control would assume this was a drifting aircraft and not pursue it.

The alternative is that once the tracking system was switched off it was ghosted by a legal aircraft (or two) that did show up on radar…. allowing the aircraft to go to that entity of another country undetected.

The reason for the hijacking was for either the 2.4 tons of cargo or the cloaking device scientists or both.

On the last course defined by the radar….what was directly ahead……..Diego De Garcia!

I believe that the aircraft likely landed at Diego de Garcia or in another state well outside Malaysia, and that small insignificant remnants were dropped into the Indian Ocean in order that they may divert from the true area that the plane went.

(By now I would think that the plane has been cut up in very small pieces  or has been used in another convenient event somewhere).

I think the whole event was sponsored by the only group that could do it and would benefit from it……. the single beneficiary that is left!

Let me ask you this…… how much would it cost for you to murder someone?

In my case if the crime were so hateful I would do it for nothing….absolutely zero!

We all have our price….. and if offered a million?….. ten million or a hundred…….?

A cloaking device is likely to be worth hundreds of millions as is a 2.4 ton shipment of gold………

Given that the governments of the world cannot offer an explanation only leads me to the conclusion that they do not WANT to!